18 Comments
User's avatar
Jim V.'s avatar

Happy New Year Jacob and brothers and sisters in Christ.

Kim's avatar

Happy New Year, Jim V.

Jim V.'s avatar

Wish you a best of new year. God bless.

Kim's avatar

Thank you! God bless you too.

CharlieSeattle's avatar

5G and what ever follows is to dangerous to humans!

The first study in the world on 5G health risks

Home /5G, Mobile Phone Masts, News, Research/The first study in the world on 5G health risks

PUBLISHED 20 JUNE 2024

– BY RADIATION PROTECTION

https://radiationresearch.org/the-first-study-in-the-world-on-5g-health-risks/

5G has been rolled out since 2019/2020. A Swedish research team has published the first study to date on how human health is affected by radiation from 5G base stations. The results show that 5G greatly increases radiofrequency radiation exposure and that ill health occurs fairly immediately after 5G is switched on near people’s homes. The study also included three children aged four to eight years. In several cases, the symptoms were so severe that people had to abandon their homes for good.

CharlieSeattle's avatar

I failed to mention.

Guys who use 5G, if you want kids, wrap aluminum foil twice around the family jewels!

Char's avatar

Even if people saw a warning sign on their technology (phones, etc) they would still use their phones every day. We are addicted to our cells.

Bassehound's avatar

Amazing to see some who cannot be without their “devise” in front of them. Have to hand it to the Amish for keeping their children away from this digital mess.

Kim's avatar
Jan 1Edited

I can't believe that once again, these people are not being honest about where we are at. They will never be honest. That is why we can never get anywhere with understanding. They are constantly misleading people making us all believe that "it's not here yet." So then, that allows them to fully deploy it (i.e. anything they're trying to get over on us) before anyone realizes what is going on and can kick up a fuss about it.

We CURRENTLY ARE using 6G with 7G equipment. LED street lights, smart meters, ring cameras, and other things like smart refrigerators, etc. are all 7G EQUIPMENT using the TERAHERTZ range, which IS 6G.

6G is in the terahertz range on the electromagnetic spectrum, which is in between the microwave and the infrared wavelengths. All of this equipment I mentioned uses the terahertz submillimeter wavelength on the electromagnetic spectrum. So therefore, it must ALREADY BE HERE.

I will see if I can readily find info confirming this.

Here is one fairly short 32 minute one. It isn't the best one, but you will get the idea.

https://rumble.com/v6pq57f-psinergy-tech-metric-pdf-feb-2025.html

Kim's avatar
Jan 1Edited

Here is another thing I learned from listening to this video by FM8 on smart meters.

Apparently, you don't need a "smart meter" to hook your electric meter to the internet, if I am understanding it correctly

They can connect it to the internet by using your own wifi that is plugged into any electrical outlet in your house by what is called "broadband over powerline (BPL). That means that although it won't be as high of a source of EMF, they will still have complete control over it by simply turning off your internet access or your electrical power.

These people are so devious. They don't miss a beat!

Here is the 14 minute video so you can listen for yourself. It is very good information to know.

https://firemedic8.substack.com/p/ami-wolf

Bassehound's avatar

Good info to know about the electric meters. Seeing how many easily complied with getting smart meters or did not care to learn about them when they arrived was maybe a heads up to how many would comply in 2020. The only choice in the current area I am in is a “hybrid” which made me guess there are transmissions happening.

Kim's avatar
Jan 2Edited

Absolutely. Same people who got the jab got the smart meter too...no questions asked!

I got a letter from the power company saying that they would be installing smart meters to "upgrade" their ability to "more accurately read people's power usage."

There was an option to "opt out" if you called them, and requested not to have a smart meter installed, but that there would be an additional $28 on your monthly bill for them to have a person come out and read your meter.

So, I did that. That was on 9/4/2025. The lady told me that someone would be out to "tag" my current meter with a green flag or something so that they would know not to install the smart meter.

That has never happened. No one has come out to do anything. My bill does say that last month's bill was based on an "actual meter reading," and no charge of $28 appears on my bill, so I don't think they have begun implementing it yet. Probably not until Spring. I don't know, but I am keeping an eagle-eye on my meter.

Something tells me that the decline of uptake for the smart meter from the public is overwhelming. People are getting wise to this agenda. At least I hope they are anyway. At least most of them.

Bassehound's avatar

$28/mo that is steep, but we know the high negative coats of them being on. Way back I was involved in the stop the install for an area I was in. We got the county to require an opt out option that originally was not

In the area I am now, the guy who showed up to change the digital meter worked hard trying to convince me to keep the digital one on.

CharlieSeattle's avatar

Scientific Concerns and Health Implications

https://environmentenergyleader.com/stories/the-hidden-health-dangers-of-wireless-radiation-a-closer-look-at-5g,45027

Exposure to wireless radiation has been scientifically linked to DNA damage, which contributes to oxidative stress, free radicals, and chronic inflammation—acute responses to such exposure compound these invisible threats. Documented symptoms include headaches, fatigue, insomnia, memory loss, confusion, nausea, and weakness.

Scientists and health professionals are increasingly concerned about the potential long-term health risks associated with 5G technology. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, highlighting the need for further research into the correlation between wireless radiation and cancer.

A 2022 review by biologist Alfonso Balmori in Environmental Research highlights significant health risks from cell tower radiation. His review, encompassing 38 studies globally, found that 73.6% showed adverse effects such as radiofrequency sickness, cancer, and biochemical changes. These findings are crucial, especially given that studies on animals and trees near cell towers, unaffected by psychosomatic factors, also show similar harmful effects.

Joy N.'s avatar

What the Holy Bible says of this horrific decade just ahead of us.. Here's a site expounding current global events in the light of bible prophecy.. To understand more, pls visit 👇 bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com

David Aarons's avatar

Utopia, will not ever come, but they will keep trying at the expense of millions (people and money).

Happy New Year, another day closer to that Blessed Hope

Jesus dog för dig's avatar

Should a Christian work with AI? Or related work?

Joy N.'s avatar

🙏🙏

What the Holy Bible says of this horrific decade just ahead of us.. Here's a site expounding current global events in the light of bible prophecy.. To understand more, pls visit 👇 https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/