Mad Scientist Wants To Engineer People To Not Like Meat And Make People Shorter To Reduce Carbon Emissions
“We can use human engineering to make it the case that we are intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins.”
Scientist Mattew Liao, Director of the Center for Bioethics and Arthur Zitrin Professor of Bioethics at the New York University School of Global Public Health, and Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Moral Philosophy, discussed in an open forum at the World Science Festival in 2016 the possibility of genetically engineering the population to reject eating meat in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The segment was called “Life in Our Image – The Ethics of Altering the Human Genome.” According to the organizers, the event discussed,
Powerful new genetic tools allow scientists to alter the DNA of any organism—with tests on human embryos already underway. Even more ambitious, synthetic biologists on the verge of creating the genetic material for a living organism from scratch are setting their long-term sites on fashioning a fully synthetic human genome. With bold promises of disease resistance and controlling human evolution, this explosive progress has ignited ethical debate. As we rewrite our code of life, how will we revise the code we live by? Join a panel of distinguished scientists and bioethicists wrestling with the moral challenges of altering the human genome.
Roughly a third of the way into the discussion, the question was asked, “How could we edit humans for climate change?” Mr. Liao took up the entire time to answer this question. Liao, a professed bioethicist and philosopher, contended that we (humans) are all equal no matter what and have “equal moral status,” and that gene-splicing ourselves and our future children with new traits is beneficial and needed.
He then argued that since people eat too much, and so through gene-editing it would be possible to get people to no longer tolerate meat and therefore would help fight climate change.
“People eat too much meat, right? If they were to cut down on their consumption of meat it would actually really help the planet. But people are not willing to give up their consumption of meat: some people will be willing to, but other people maybe willing to, but they have a weakness of will. They say, ‘Wow, this steak is too juicy, I can’t do it’ – I’m one of those people.
“But here’s the thought, right? It turns out – we have these intolerances to – like I have a milk intolerance, and some people are intolerant to crayfish, so possibly we can use human engineering to make it the case that we are intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins, and there’s actually analogs of this in life: there’s this thing called the Lonestar Tick where if it bites you, you’ll become allergic to meat.
“So, that’s something that we can do through human engineering. We can kinda possibly address really big world problems through human engineering.”
Liao did not stop there. After stating this, he went onto explain the benefits of engineering humanity to become smaller in height to reduce emissions as well.
“It turns out that the larger you are – think of the lifetime greenhouse gas emissions that require – the energy that’s required to transport larger people rather than smaller people.
“But, if we’re smaller just by 15 centimeters, right? – I did the math and it’s about mass reduction by about 25%, which is huge. And a hundred years ago we were all on average smaller, exactly 15 centimeters smaller, right?
“So think just of the lifetime greenhouse gas emissions if we had smaller children, right? And so that’s something we can do through human engineering.”
Near the end of the discussion, Liao also hinted at the idea that perhaps through gene-editing families could have several small children instead of just one child, as countries like China have done for many years.
This is not the first time Liao has suggested scientists selectively gene-splicing to make people smaller, as he lobbied for this on Australia’s Sunrise Weekend in 2015.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; [2] Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; [3] Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. [4] For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: [5] For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
If you’ve never heard of this, there is a thing called the “Georgia Guidestones,” a “ten commandments” of sorts that lay out some goals for the new world order. There is a lot of speculation as to who made these stones and their messages, but the list is endless from the Freemasons, the Illuminati, Rosicrucians, White supremacists – and it is written in 10 different languages that all say this:
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature
Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity
Unite humanity with a living new language
Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court
Avoid petty laws and useless officials
Balance personal rights with social duties
Prize truth – beauty – love-seeking harmony with the infinite
Be not a cancer on the earth – leave room for nature – leave room for nature.
So beyond just the meat consumption, ‘in order to save time and money, right?, let’s just mandate that people can’t get married because we need to reduce the number of allowable children, right?’ (I’m mocking that pinhead). Lord only knows, but regardless, the prophecy in 1 Timothy 4 is being fulfilled and will continue to intensify.
[7] Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? [8] Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also? [9] For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? [10] Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope. (1 Corinthians 9:7-10).
The WinePress needs your support! If God has laid it on your heart to want to contribute, please prayerfully consider donating to this ministry. If you cannot gift a monetary donation, then please donate your fervent prayers to keep this ministry going! Thank you and may God bless you.
These scientists are demon possessed for sure. If people are dumb enough to take and trust COVID genetic altering vaccines, then they will allow anything for their offspring. Majority people have lost their minds and lack critical thinking skills and will fall for anything. Few people have head on straight which is why I keep friends casual and don't get involved with any group activities. Like being alone, an avid reader/researcher and watch decades old movies. I have lived in this town for decades (born and raised elsewhere) only a few people (elderly some have died recently) who are tuned into agenda 2030. It is useless having friends that are dumbed down and spineless. Tell others: not to take gene editing/Mrna altering vaccines, do the research on which ones are. update avoid: flu, rsv, DPT, shingles and most all childhood vaccines for viruses..
What we need is a way to edit what all these scientist's do, when they try to play God; it zaps their brain and lose all their high education.
Obviously, we can't and won't play God, but what a thought.